Received: from nova.unix.portal.com by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.11/Netcom)
id WAA17797; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 22:42:01 -0800
From: Jeric@cup.portal.com
Received: from hobo.online.portal.com (hobo.online.portal.com [156.151.5.5]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.11/8.6.5) with ESMTP id WAA07902 for <lightwave-l@netcom.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 22:43:54 -0800
Received: (pccop@localhost) by hobo.online.portal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id WAA13081 for lightwave-l@netcom.com; Tue, 28 Mar 1995 22:43:54 -0800
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Suggestion
Lines: 26
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 95 22:43:53 PST
Message-ID: <9503282243.6.12993@cup.portal.com>
X-Origin: The Portal System (TM)
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
>It's not one button, it's several. Why do it more than once. It's these
>little things that can add up to a big problem. All this button binking is a
>problem, particularly when you're going back and forth to the same set of
>buttons on a routine basis.
Hell, you guys are whomping on the wrong feature if you're worried
about "button binking", or, as I prefer, "mouse walloping".
The SURFACES requestors are >>THE<< biggest time wasters in Lightwave.
While admirably designed for >clarity< , they become a big time sink when
you are adjusting things three requesters down, popping out, and going back
in. IMNeverHO, they deserve a thorough re-working by Allen.
Labels in the title bar wouldn't hear either.
> R e a l World: Sean C. Cunningham | possessing merit." -P.J. O'Rourke